Perfect PIR

[SimpleSimon]

Just wondering if anyone has ever come across a perfect PIR?
Nearly had one today, but a busbar point without a rubber topping stopped it. All tests where fine though, and that and no rubber gromits in some back boxes. So not a major deal.

 

[bugsy]

of course, mind you we did the original installations

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Depends who it's for to be honest.
I do like to throw in at least a couple of code 4s, just so it looks like I've actually done something

 

[Sintra]

I tested the health & safety executive offices in Belfast a few years back. Not so much as a label missing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.

 

[SimpleSimon]

Depends who it's for to be honest.
I do like to throw in at least a couple of code 4s, just so it looks like I've actually done something

Lol. That's what I was doing. Just to justify my day.
And on that note can some of the older sparks answer me this.
Today's install was done under the 16th. TNCS The main tails was 16mm bonding 6mm and earthing 10mm. Was these sizes acceptable under the 16th or should be coded 4?

 

[DurhamSparky]

code 4 does not comply with 17th!

 

[Deleted member 26818]

I think the bonding was acceptable prior to 2002, when ESQCR was changed.
Earthing and tails are still acceptable now.

 

[SimpleSimon]

Ta Durham.

 

[DurhamSparky]

not an old spark by the way either before you get clever!! lol....

 

[SimpleSimon]

Thats what they all say.

 

[DurhamSparky]

well i am edging nearer 27 than 26