I would like to reuse a 10mm cable to provide a ring circuit in an area. The cable is currently used for an electric shower, still connected at present and is fine. When the shower is removed I intended to replace the 40A breaker with a 32A, slightly reroute the cable and add a ring to then end. I have no idea where regs might stand on this however I can see no electrical reason why it should not be ok. I imagine that rerunning the ring will be suggested but that is easier said than done. Any thoughts.
 
If you are implying that the customer doesn’t keep a hold of the test certs for any future sparky… then why do we bother filling them in at all? 😉


Whether it’s recorded as a departure or somewhere else… I just meant it should be noted somewhere.

Any future spark working on a board should have enough common sense to realise if say, circuit 1 is a 10mm, but circuit chart says sockets… then there’s something unusual going on. Quick read would confirm it’s by design and not a mistake.
 
The more common example of this has an isolator switch at the feed -> RFC point, for example, for a laboratory/classroom/etc.

You don't need one here, but at least an accessible and labelled junction box location is good, such as a blanking plate on the old cooker outlet, etc. 10mm is too big for the usual Wagos, but you might find something of adequate rating to fit in there.
 
Thanks for the comments, all valid. More info it better than less (or none). I will mark the board to indicate that the circuit is "lollipop".
No do not do that, it is rough and not the way. you could take the 10mm2 cable into a little enclosure with a lid and a double pole isolator switch and connect it to the top, then the 2 2.5mm2 cables of the new ring to the bottom, label the enclose and then that is better that a lollypop connection. the enclosure could be fitted in a cupboard or somewhere less noticeable to the eye whilst acting as a connection box and isolating switch. Personally I don't even like that idea but better than a lolly pop connection.
 
No do not do that, it is rough and not the way. you could take the 10mm2 cable into a little enclosure with a lid and a double pole isolator switch and connect it to the top, then the 2 2.5mm2 cables of the new ring to the bottom, label the enclose and then that is better that a lollypop connection. the enclosure could be fitted in a cupboard or somewhere less noticeable to the eye whilst acting as a connection box and isolating switch. Personally I don't even like that idea but better than a lolly pop connection.

How would that be any different? Other than adding an isolator, which nobody will ever use, and will be just another potential point of failure, but hat does it achieve?

And what is wrong with the lollipop circuit?

Just because a circuit doesn't comply with the standard circuits laid out in the on-site guide it doesn't make it any less valid or compliant.
 
How would that be any different? Other than adding an isolator, which nobody will ever use, and will be just another potential point of failure, but hat does it achieve?

And what is wrong with the lollipop circuit?

Just because a circuit doesn't comply with the standard circuits laid out in the on-site guide it doesn't make it any less valid or compliant.
Hey Dave I understand your point, as said in my reply I don't really like the isolator either, but it is good for connecting a 10mm2 to 2x2.5mm2 cables tight and securely, I am wondering how the 10mm2 and the 2 new 2.5mm2 cables are to be joined to create a lollypop, I have seen this before. One way is to join it through with crimps which I think is carp, yes you can get crimps with a 10mm2 hole one side and a 6mm2 the other, but where are you doing this? under the floor, in a JB ? I am unsure, My suggestion is without doubt not great but I have seen it done and I think better than crimping it through, lets see what the OP comes back with, happy to hear your preffered method too.
 
1000035292.png

Could stick something like this in a little box on some din rail to get the connection. In a cupboard much like the isolator would be really, would be maintainable and hits the required CSA needs as per manufacturers spec. Would be much nicer with stranded cables and some double ferrules!
 
funnily enough and as a total coincidence I had a chat to a sparky yesterday who did this exact same not so long ago and he said he used maintenance free terminals/ wagos/ connection points to join the 2x2.5mm2 cables to the 10mm2 cable and used these in a maintenance connection box to create a lollypop ring, Dave sparks based on the chat with him although I hate the idea I am now of the opinion it is not terrible and it is doable, even in my mid life crisis I do learn something new :grin:
 
A twin cooker connection unit can easily change 10 mm to two 2.5 mm cables, the consideration has to be overload near the cooker connection unit, in same way as with sockets close to the consumer unit.
 
funnily enough and as a total coincidence I had a chat to a sparky yesterday who did this exact same not so long ago and he said he used maintenance free terminals/ wagos/ connection points to join the 2x2.5mm2 cables to the 10mm2 cable and used these in a maintenance connection box to create a lollypop ring, Dave sparks based on the chat with him although I hate the idea I am now of the opinion it is not terrible and it is doable, even in my mid life crisis I do learn something new :grin:
I would have liked to have seen a pic of the MF wago/enclosure.
 
No issue with a LolliPop radial/Ring, But I would be more inclined to just extend the circuit in 6mm and have a 32a radial socket circuit

By the time you've run in and terminated all that 6 you might as well have rerun the circuit in 2.5!

For me if the legs back to the CU are really that traumatic I'd just use 2.5 and make it a radial or stuff a small cu on the end making the 10 a submain. The problem with lollipop circuits is what values you record on testing and leaving non-obvious things for future workers, as invariably the junction will end up being concealed.
 
I would like to reuse a 10mm cable to provide a ring circuit in an area. The cable is currently used for an electric shower, still connected at present and is fine. When the shower is removed I intended to replace the 40A breaker with a 32A, slightly reroute the cable and add a ring to then end. I have no idea where regs might stand on this however I can see no electrical reason why it should not be ok. I imagine that rerunning the ring will be suggested but that is easier said than done. Any thoughts.
a cooker connection block would take the 10mm, and put the 2x2.5 in the other end of the terminal; a label on the consumer unit for that circuit stating that the 10mm has been de-rated to 32a would be useful.
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Brentwood
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
DIY or Homeowner (Perhaps seeking pro advice, or an electrician)

Thread Information

Title
Re using a 10mm cable to provide a new ring
Prefix
UK 
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
23
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
pal1952,
Last reply from
Gasinspect,
Replies
23
Views
2,413

Advert

Back
Top